A penetration test report is a list of problems. We turn it into shipped fixes — working alongside your engineers, then validating the result.
A penetration test produced many findings, but the engineering team doesn't have the bandwidth, context, or specialized expertise to remediate them. Findings sit open, risk stays live, and the next audit finds the same issues again. This is the gap this service closes directly.
This isn't limited to ACS-originated assessments. A findings report from another vendor, an internal audit, or a compliance assessment is a valid starting point — the remediation work is the same either way.
No — this service works with findings from any source: your own pentest vendor, an internal audit, a compliance assessment, or an ACS engagement. The findings report is the input, regardless of who produced it.
We pair directly with your engineers — implementing fixes alongside the team that owns the affected systems, not working in isolation and handing over a patch nobody understands. That's a deliberate choice: fixes that your team didn't help build are fixes your team won't be able to maintain.
Yes — validation against the original findings is included, confirming the fix actually closes the issue rather than just changing its symptoms.
By actual risk, not by severity label alone — exploitability, business impact, and remediation cost all factor into the sequencing we propose. You get a prioritized plan, not just a re-sorted list.
Yes — we coordinate directly with an MSP or existing provider where remediation touches infrastructure they manage, rather than working around them.
We'll tell you that directly and help scope a compensating control or documented risk-acceptance instead of pretending every finding has a clean fix.
Both models exist. A defined findings backlog is typically a scoped, time-boxed engagement; if remediation work is continuous, that fits under Continuous Security Support instead.
Send us the findings report — ours or anyone else's — and we'll scope what remediation actually looks like.